Analysis of English Language Training for Engineering Students in India Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

This essay investigates the efficacy English language instruction provided Indian engineering institutes. In India, a large number of engineering graduates are jobless as a result of their weak communication abilities and lack of confidence. Numerous research publications have emphasized the need of improving the employability of engineering graduates, yet the issue of inadequate communication skills in India keeps becoming worse. This study’s primary goal is to comprehend the realities of engineering college English classrooms in order to solve the puzzle of why so many Indian engineering graduates perform so poorly. The on- Campus placements during their final year studies nevertheless cause a lot of third-year students to feel uneasy. Additionally, it has been shown that teachers’ methods need to be modified because many Students prefer more engaging sessions to help their language abilities. Survey results highlighted the significance suitable training programmers for engineering students by demonstrating a discrepancy between English instructors’ engineering students’ confidence levels and technique. On the LSRW skills were sharpened highest value trained to participate in group discussion lowest value. Communication abilities are crucial in engineering environment cannot be overstated. Good job opportunities are easily available to many urban students with good communication skills. However, rural students remain a job nightmare Lack of communication skills. Measuring paper describes an experiment and improves competence with the help of 45- hour communication skills course at a rural engineering college. The overall communication skills of the course students, In Sentence Structure and Vocabulary by self and peer assessment Statistically We have seen significant progress. Volume and pronunciation underwent statistically significant improvement as assessed by peers. Group discussion seems to contribute more to development and minimal brainstorming. Rural engineering students during their academic course Learn interpersonal communication skills Opportunities to practice should be provided. Exploring relationships between their comfort levels in therapy. Among engineering students in Saudi Arabia Cultural competence, communication skills using web- based survey and overall preparedness were assessed by the researchers. Communication skills and relationship with patients and such as comfort ratings of medical conditions between individual items in a survey assessing variables significant correlations were found. Overall, students' responses were about the people of Saudi Arabia Inadequate knowledge and treatment of Saudi Arabian patients some reflect discomfort. Language proficiency with Saudi Arabian patients and clinical experience Associated with comfort with Saudi Arabian patients. These findings were among medical and engineering students in Saudi Arabia Positive correlations suggest that they have Ability to improve patient care. Patient- centeredness with Saudi patients for cultural immersion that focuses on communication with Providing opportunities and training, the provider may prevent developing unsatisfactory relationships with Saudi patients. The main factors used are sentence construction, eye contact presentation skills, content knowledge, eye contact, and voice, pronunciation and vocabulary to analyze the communication skills of her engineering students.

[1]. Clement, Aloy, and Tamil Murugavel. “English for Employability: A Case Study of the English Language Training Need Analysis for Engineering Students in India.” English language teaching8, no. 2 (2015): 116-125.

[2]. Gözüyeşil, Eda. “An analysis of engineering students’ English language needs.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences116 (2014): 4182-4186.

[3]. Gömleksi˙ z, M. N. “Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey).” European journal of engineering education32, no. 5 (2007): 613-625.

[4]. Kim, EunGyong, and Abigail Shin. “Seeking an effective program to improve communication skills of non-English-speaking graduate Engineering students: The case of a Korean Engineering school.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication57, no. 1 (2014): 41-55.

[5]. Esmaeili, Hameed. “Integrated reading and writing tasks and ESL students’ reading and writing performance in an English language test.” Canadian Modern Language Review58, no. 4 (2002): 599-620.

[6]. Panyawong-Ngam, Leechai, NipontTangthong, and PramoteAnunvrapong. “A model to develop the English proficiency of engineering students at Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, Thailand.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences192 (2015): 77-82.

[7]. Nahavandi, Naemeh, and JayakaranMukundan. “Iranian EFL Engineering Students’ Motivational Orientations towards English Language Learning along Gender and Further Education in Language Institutes.” International Journal of Linguistics5, no. 1 (2013): 72.

[8]. Butler, H. G., and T. J. nan Dyk. “An academic English language intervention for first year engineering students.” Southern African linguistics and applied language studies22, no. 1-2 (2004): 1-8.

[9]. Pritchard, Rosalind MO, and Atef Nasr. “Improving reading performance among Egyptian engineering students: principles and practice.” English for Specific Purposes23, no. 4 (2004): 425-445.

[10]. Dolgova, Natalia, Julia Larionova, and Anastasia Shirokolobova. “Engineering students English teaching in E-learning environment.” In MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 297, p. 06007. EDP Sciences, 2019.

[11]. Melles, Gavin. “Teaching and evaluation of critical appraisal skills to postgraduate ESL engineering students.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International46, no. 2 (2009): 161-170.

[12]. Wait, Isaac W., and Justin W. Gressel. “Relationship between TOEFL score and academic success for international engineering students.” Journal of Engineering Education98, no. 4 (2009): 389-398.

[13]. Delahoz-Dominguez, Enrique, RohemiZuluaga, and Tomas Fontalvo-Herrera. “Dataset of academic performance evolution for engineering students.” Data in brief30 (2020): 105537.

[14]. Chandran Subramani, Sathiyaraj Chinnasamy, Ashwini Murugan, Chandrasekar Raja, “Composite Material Selection for Structural Applications Using WPM Method”, Journal on Materials and its Characterization, 1(2), (2022):2022

[15]. Phillips, Margaret, Amy Van Epps, Nastasha Johnson, and Dave Zwicky. “Effective engineering information literacy instruction: A systematic literature review.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship44, no. 6 (2018): 705-711.

[16]. Hatam, Amir Hussein, and ShilanShafiei. “The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ESP Courses in Enhancing Technical Translation Proficiency: A Case Study of ESP Course for Mechanical Engineering Students.” English Language Teaching5, no. 5 (2012): 68-78.

[17]. Kovalyova, Yu, Alexandra VladimirovnaSoboleva, and A. T. Kerimkulov. “Project Based Learning in Teaching Communication Skills in English as a Foreign Language to Engineering Students.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning11, no. 4 (2016).

[18]. Ngah, Ezihaslinda, Noor RahaMohdRadzuan, Wan JumaniFauzi, and Noor Azlinda Zainal Abidin. “The need for competent work ready English language learners.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences29 (2011): 1490-1499.

[19]. Van den Beemt, Antoine, Miles MacLeod, Jan Van der Veen, Anne Van de Ven, Sophie van Baalen, Renate Klaassen, and Mieke Boon. “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support.” Journal of engineering education109, no. 3 (2020): 508-555.

[20]. Bodnar, Cheryl A., Daniel Anastasio, Joshua A. Enszer, and Daniel D. Burkey. “Engineers at play: Games as teaching tools for undergraduate engineering students.” Journal of Engineering Education105, no. 1 (2016): 147-200.

[21]. Yasmin, Musarat, and Afifa Yasmeen. “Viability of outcome-based education in teaching English as second language to chemical engineering learners.” Education for Chemical Engineers36 (2021): 100-106.

[22]. Kaewpet, Chamnong. “Communication needs of Thai civil engineering students.” English for specific purposes28, no. 4 (2009): 266-278.

[23]. Jasvinder Kaur, M. Ramachandran, Sathiyaraj Chinnasamy, Prabakaran Nanjundan, “Building Logistics Capabilities through Third-party Logistics Relationships Using COPRAS Method”, REST Journal on Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, 1(3), (2022):1-8

[24]. Kim, EunGyong, Soo-Ok Kweon, and Jeongyeon Kim. “Korean engineering students’ perceptions of English-medium instruction (EMI) and L1 use in EMI classes.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development38, no. 2 (2017): 130-145.

[25]. Lee, Joseph J., and J. Elliott Casal. “Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering.” System46 (2014): 39-54.

[26]. Yeo, Shelley. “First‐year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism.” High Education Research & Development26, no. 2 (2007): 199-216.

[27]. Meksophawannagul, Mantana. “Teacher and Learner Views on Effective English Teaching in the Thai Context: The Case of Engineering Students.” English Language Teaching8, no. 11 (2015): 99-116.

Nikam Suvarna Prashant, “Analysis of English Language Training for Engineering Students in India Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method”, Contemporaneity of English Language and Literature in the Robotized Millennium, 1(1), (2022):15-22