1(4), (2022):7-12. DOI: http://doi.org/10.46632/jame/1/4/2
Sheetal Prajapati, Ankit Kumar Mishra, Masetty Akshay
A nose cone is the conically shaped forward most section of a rocket, guided missile or aircraft, designed to modulate oncoming airflow behaviours and minimize drag. In this paper, the authors analysed by means of a computational procedure the influence of varying the angle of attack for shapes of rocket nose cones in each of them, with this analysed and calculated the values of the, coefficient of lift and the coefficient of drag generated by our nose cones having as a working parameter in subsonic medium ranging from a Mach 0.03 to approximately 0.50, considering standard conditions for temperature and pressure. Drag and Lift both are aerodynamic forces which need to be calculated for cones. Objects with every kind of shapes experience a significant magnitude of Cl and Cd from airflow with the use of the ANSYS platform based on the CFD Fluent method it was possible to measure behaviour in the 3 shapes of cones and thus analyse the different contours. We showed the variation of pressure and velocity with their graphs. The scope of this paper is to simulate the different nose cones with different angle of attack for taking out the best result and comparing which one cone is best for which angle of attack
Ashish Narayan, S Narayanan and Rakesh Kumar, “HYPERSONIC FLOW PAST NOSE CONES OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”, SIMULATION: Transactions of The Society for Modeling and Simulation International , pp .1 -16. ,October 2017 , DOI: 10.1177/0037549717733051.
Ashish Narayan, S.Narayanan, Rakesh Ritesh ,“HYPERSONIC FLOW PAST PARABOLIC AND ELLIPTIC NOSE CONE CONFIGURATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”, Proceedings of the 7th International and 45th National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (FMFP) December , IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India ,pp .1-10, December 2018, (FMFP2018–257).
Lucas de Almeida Sabino Carvalho, GeovanioClaudino Cavalcante Filho, “CFD ANALYSIS OF DRAG FORCE FOR DIFFERENT NOSE CONE DESIGN”, Av. Salgado Filho, 3000 – Lagoa Nova – Natal RN , pp.- 1-4 , October 2019, 59078-970.
Bogdan-AlexandruBELEGA , ”ANALYSIS OF NEW AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OF THE NOSE CONE SECTION USING CFD AND SPH,” 3rd International Workshop on Numerical Modelling in Aerospace Sciences, NMAS 2015, 06-07 May 2015, Bucharest, Romania, (held at INCAS, B-dul Iuliu Maniu 220, sector , pp- 1-9, May 2015, DOI: 10.13111/2066-8201.2015.7.2.4
Anton Scholten, Hemanth Goparaju, Datta Gaitonde, Pedro Paredes, Meelan M. Choudhari, , Fei Li,” LINEAR DISTURBANCE AMPLIFICATION OVER BLUNTED FLAT PLATES IN HIGH-SPEED FLOWS”, AIAA AVIATION Forum June 27-July 1, 2022, Chicago, IL & Virtual AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum, pp-1-16, July 2022, (DOI: 10.2514/6.2022-3471)
Murat TOPTAS, Mehmet YILMAZ, ”EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT NOSE CONE DESIGNS ON TRAJECTORY AND IMPACT ANGLE OF SMART FIRE EXTINGUISHING AMMUNITION”, NATURENGS, MTU Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2:2 (2021) pp .1-15, July 2021, (DOI: 10.46572/naturengs.949458).
Ankit Kumar Mishra, Amandeep Singh, “ANALYSIS OF FLOW VARIATION OVER ELLIPTICAL NOSE CONE AT DIFFERENT ANGLE OF ATTACK”, International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research, (IJAER) 2020, Vol. No. 20, Issue No. III, pp-1-6 September, September 2020.
Perkins EW, Jorgensen LH and Sommer SC. “Investigation of the drag of various axially symmetric nose shapes of fineness ratio 3 for mach numbers from 1.24 to 7.4.” NACA ,Research Memorandum, page no. 1-21 ,1952.
Schneider, S., “Hypersonic Laminar-Turbulent Transition on Circular Cones and Scramjet Forebodies,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 40, 2004, pp. 1–50. (doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2003.11.001.)
Iyer, A. R., Pant, A. “A REVIEW ON NOSE CONE DESIGNS FOR DIFFERENT FLIGHT REGIMES, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY” (IRJET), Volume: 07 Issue: 08,2020, pp- 1-9,3546-3554.
Sheetal Prajapati, Ankit Kumar Mishra, Masetty Akshay, “Comparative Study on Nose Cones with respect to Angle of Attack using CFD”, REST Journal on Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 1(4), (2022):7-12.